Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham
Gee, I don’t know

That's been obvious since the beginning. Until there is a majority in congress who are serious about and willing to do something about border security and funding, nothing but lip service will be paid to the problem of illegals. The POTUS doesn't have dictatorial powers.

84 posted on 01/02/2013 10:02:51 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (Carry a Gun, It's a Lighter Burden Than Regret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Alaska Wolf

“The POTUS doesn’t have dictatorial powers.”

Give up your lame excuses. Your statement is an irrelevancy which you raise in a feeble attempt to ignore Dubya’s own culpability.

Dubya’s intention, which he alluded to repeatedly when he ran for the Presidency, was to ignore and subvert American immigration law. And that is what he did.

For Dubya, his oath of office wasn’t binding when it required him to enforce immigration law. Mexican nationals were welcome to break the law and he helped them do it. He had no intention of deporting them back to their own country.

By comparison to the worthless Dubya, Clinton was a hard line law and order President when it came to enforcing immigration law. And of course Clinton didn’t do much. He simply didn’t try to subvert the law in Dubya’s fashion.

So now, thanks to Bush and his treason lobby pals, California is a bastion for the Democratic left. And it will become even more solidly so when Obama finally pushes through Bush’s amnesty. I fully expect to see Crawford’s village idiot attending the signing ceremony. Enjoy.


86 posted on 01/02/2013 10:44:13 PM PST by Pelham (Betrayal, it's not just for Democrats anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson