[familyop]

"Sometimes Gun Control is necessary. One night my husband stayed out late at the local bar...He was also drunk."

There are already laws against carrying firearms while drunk. There's no need for more anti-Second-Amendment gun control against law abiding citizens.

And obviously, per capita, more "progressives" (including feminists, homos, all) are more often drunk than are conservatives. Romanticist socialists--those behind the attacks against America's Second Amendment--should rid themselves of their addictions before minding the business of healthier people.

[gleeaikin]

My point was that “Gun Control” is also a private matter. My husband was NOT carrying a gun, but when he came home in a rage, I hid his gun as soon as I could before he got some wild idea to go hunting for the guys who mugged him.

If the mother of the Conn. shooter had protected the guns in her house better or removed them from the house, she and 25 other people might still be alive. Apparently she was already worried about his stability, and she failed to exercise her own Gun Control.

[gleeaikin]

My point was that “Gun Control” is also a private matter. My husband was NOT carrying a gun, but when he came home in a rage, I hid his gun as soon as I could before he got some wild idea to go hunting for the guys who mugged him.

If the mother of the Conn. shooter had protected the guns in her house better or removed them from the house, she and 25 other people might still be alive. Apparently she was already worried about his stability, and she failed to exercise her own Gun Control.