You’re right —the Russians don’t like Hillary, and so why would THEY cover for her?
They wouldn’t.
The Regime UNDERSTANDS that post F&F/Bengazi/etc etc their credibility has struck bottom in certain quarters; they understand that when THEY are seen as the source of their own stupid story, that alone might be enough to render it UNbelievable.
What to do...?
Cook up a story that would succeed in distracting the cynics (i.e. us and many others), but attribute it to another entity famously known to oppose them; the entity can be mostly a liar, but to succeed the entity only needs to be seen as LESS of a liar than Hillary (which admittedly is most of the civilized world).
“Iran crash” satisfies our reflexive and appropriate need to believe the truth is always hidden, but gets us away from our iron-clad belief that HILLARY IS ALWAYS LYING.
The gravy is that “IranCrashBloodClot” magically transforms Hillary into a victim —read above how even Freepers are “wishing her well”:
What does that say about the considerably more effective outcome that this hookum will have on the mouth-breathing public at large, hmm.....?
Until I see her thighness with a today-dated copy of the IBD held up next to her, the dates of her absence - and I’m looking at other headlines Dec 3-13 - she just may have been aboard that flight. Guess we’ll have to wait.