Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orange1998
Once the pipeline is finished lets see who is faster.

So far, the trains are ahead in developing new capacity, and are more versatile--at least for the time being. The rail loading facilities were built because the pipelines were not. When light sweet crude is selling for a $30 discount because there is no way to move it (as it was), someone will find a way, not only to move the material, but to profit from it. They did.

The other simple advantage is that the EPA hasn't been able to ban trains yet.

24 posted on 12/29/2012 9:39:16 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

It costs about $5/bll to ship by pipeline vs $10-$15/bll by rail car. (Railcar cost = up to 3 x pipeline cost) Oil sources, where infrastructure is insufficient, might use rail car, ...but generally the best buy is to ship to a terminal nearby, then continue the shipment by pipeline.


28 posted on 12/29/2012 10:11:04 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson