Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

Perhaps you should read the article. The article was about Obama policies, not election campaigns.


4 posted on 12/27/2012 2:56:11 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dforest
Perhaps you should read the article. The article was about Obama policies, not election campaigns.

I did read the article. The author's point was made without considering the points I made, that Mitt Romney ran a lousy campaign and ran to the left away from the base of the GOP, instead of campaigning on a strictly limited government message, appealing to the all three factions of conservatives, like Reagan did, the Social, the Fiscal, and Military factions.

Instead, he gave the finger to social conservatives and told the Fiscal conservatives to go pound sand. He did, for the most part, speak to the Military conservative faction, but that alone was never going to win him the election.

Couple that with his total refusal to going after the failed policies and positions of the Marxist, Obama, and you have a sure-fired recipe for losing an election.

And instead of the pundits on our side, and those who supported Romney, being honest about it, we instead get lamentations about the cheating that went on and how the electorate has changed to a point that we, as conservatives, will never win a political race again.

Cowards!

You Don't run a Democrat-Lite politician as a Republican and then expect to win a national election.
8 posted on 12/27/2012 3:08:15 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson