Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Media_never_lie
If same sex marriages are legal, why can’t a man marry two or three women, so long as he can afford them?

This is the real crux of the problem with re-defining marriage. Once you re-define it for gays, you simply cannot say no to other redefinitions.

If it is okay for two men to be included in the definition of marriage, then (as you say) why not one man and multiple women, or vice versa, one woman and multiple men. You simply have no legal basis on which to say no to any other grouping of people that someone comes up with.

Redfining marriage for "gays" is just the beginning, it will never stop, the redefining will go on and on. Eventually the term marriage is meaninless, and then the people pushing this have won their objective. They want to be rid of marriage, and they are on their way to succeeding.

12 posted on 12/26/2012 5:11:12 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianLiz

Exactly. And replace the natural family with the “benevolent” state.

Check #26-

http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm


13 posted on 12/26/2012 5:32:05 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz

Sadly, your post is accurate. These reformers don’t care for history and are destined to fail. The crazy families will leave a trail of damaged children.


14 posted on 12/26/2012 6:00:29 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson