I get the issue. Andrew's sudden death left Dana without an direction at the Big Journalism site. She probably had major disagreements on the direction and over what she wanted to write. So it sounded like she wanted out, but she was not let out of the contract. One wonders if it had to do with the Todd Akin coverage or with various other topics like the video that was not released that Andrew wanted out, only to give us a different video, Obama and Derek Bell. that some say is not the same thing Andrew talked about at the CPAC. Either way, I sense she wanted to go a different direction like maybe continue on her website that she abandoned when she joined Breitbart and start appearing on PJTV, for example or The Blaze Tv, which she did over the summer. But they wouldn't let her out. She is a real good radio host to me. I hope she gets to go because she had made it clear by no longer working for them that she will not do anything more if she stays.
1 posted on
12/23/2012 6:14:58 PM PST by
Mozilla
To: Mozilla
I like Breitbart.com. I'd hate to see them have to pay. What she did there wasn't worth that much money. She should just be gracious and leave. Breitbart.com has done a lot for the people of this country.
To: Mozilla
The Saint Louis post dispatch had a little more information. Sounded like it was a difference of direction and a assumption the site was not going the way Andrew wanted it so they said Dana said it was a dying site or group of sites. They made it sound like she wanted out and they wouldn’t let her, but she quit in September. But they actually renewed her contract. So she works for them still, but she is not working for them. In other words she quit doing the articles and work she did with them.
The Mediaite article focuses more on her not being with CNN on air, but CNN still listing her as a contributor.
And a few people asked about Dana when Breitbart.com announced the hiring of Washington Time’s Kerry Picket this month.
3 posted on
12/23/2012 6:30:58 PM PST by
Mozilla
To: Mozilla
I hope this can be worked out. I like them both.
5 posted on
12/23/2012 6:47:59 PM PST by
SueRae
(It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
To: Mozilla
Can someone explain to me if theres supposed to be a scandal that someone pees on the corpse of a Taliban fighter?
Someone who, as part of an organization, murdered over 3,000 Americans?
Id drop trou and do it too. Thats me, though.
I want a million cool points for these guys. Is that harsh to say?
Come on people, this is a war. What do you think this is?
~Dana Loesch
7 posted on
12/23/2012 7:27:29 PM PST by
wolficatZ
(Hey blue states....Got Food?)
To: Mozilla
A lot of shuffling among radio hosts lately. Savage, Ingraham and now Leosch. It seems people are taking sides. No?
9 posted on
12/23/2012 9:01:23 PM PST by
logitech
(Who's here so vile, that will not love his country? If any speak, for him I have offended)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson