“These are shocking conclusions to read and shocking words to have to say. But you do not defend the British Army by defending the indefensible.” - David Cameron
Go on trying to defend the indefensible, if you like. Fourteen innocent people were killed. I hope their families don’t read what you’re writing.
What am I writing? That the IRA used them as human shields? You’re parroting the IRA’s position as is Cameron. Never mind mischaracterizing the NICRA while I expose the truth about them, a truth that a lot of their members may not know to this day.
By all means, compare the NICRA to the Tea Party again. How many Tea Party events broke laws? None. Can’t say the same about the NICRA and their communist leadership (Betty Sinclair of the Communist Party being their first chairperson). The IRA was almost crushed until useful-idiot “civil rights/civil liberties” front groups like them came along; then the IRA got a second wind. Back to the “one struggle” mural: the IRA are the same as Hamas.
Like I’ve pointed out, I don’t argue about your presently equating the IRA with Hamas. You are wrong about including Bloody Sunday, January 30th, 1972, in this. And it’s offensive, as has also already been brought to your attention.