To: Tailgunner Joe
“The NRA could have chosen to be a voice for the vast majority of its own members who want common-sense, reasonable safeguards on deadly firearms, but instead it chose to defend extreme pro-gun positions that aren't even popular among the law-abiding gun owners it represents.”
Bull Crap statement!
2 posted on
12/21/2012 6:51:22 PM PST by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Red_Devil 232
Yes, he’s talking out his rear end
6 posted on
12/21/2012 6:53:58 PM PST by
Red Steel
To: Red_Devil 232
“Gabby and I are extremely disappointed by the NRA’s defiant and delayed response to the massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School,” Mark Kelly said in a statement.”
Does it look like I give a F*** what you think. The Bolsheviks are trotting everybody out now to shill for them.
11 posted on
12/21/2012 6:59:50 PM PST by
Stormdog
(A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
To: Red_Devil 232
Why is armed security the right answer to protect congress and federal workers but wrong for protecting little kids in public schools?
54 posted on
12/22/2012 3:24:01 AM PST by
Godebert
(No Person Except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson