Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: what's up

Not necessarily, because not only would it have protected 99.8% (including the huge number of businesses from $250,000 - $1 M) it would have pressured Obama to implement more ENTITLEMENT CUTS which may have been the more beneficial catalyst for the economy.

Boehner was trying to play chess. The dissenters didn’t get it.

They got it all right-—that Boehner is an idiot who doesn’t recognize that Obama is a Communist who will not tolerate dissent.


263 posted on 01/03/2013 1:23:41 PM PST by alstewartfan ("You looked like a still From Cecil B DeMille When I saw you Waiting at my door." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: alstewartfan
who will not tolerate dissent.

Looks like Obama was just forced to tolerate raising taxes on only the top tax rate and giving in on estate taxes and NOT extending the payroll tax cut...all things he said he would never bend on.

Obama is getting some wins...but getting some losses too. Let's see how he does when the onus is on spending ONLY next time around without the tax cut debate.

(BTW...Dear Leader also had to tolerate a provision NOT to allow terrorists onto US soil just this morning...something he really did not want to sign.)

264 posted on 01/03/2013 2:13:49 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson