To: Sub-Driver
They weren’t his guns. They were stolen by him.
3 posted on
12/19/2012 10:35:22 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: Dr. Sivana
He should go through a background check before he steals guns.
14 posted on
12/19/2012 10:41:05 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Dr. Sivana
in addition to trigger locks, you need to buy a one ton safe as well.
27 posted on
12/19/2012 10:49:23 AM PST by
TurboZamboni
(Looting the future to bribe the present)
To: Dr. Sivana
I was thinking the same thing.
To: Dr. Sivana
I was thinking the same thing.
To: Dr. Sivana
Yes, this keeps being not reported this way.
He actually was denied a gun purchase prior. By the store.
He then went criminal, and stole the guns of a law-abiding gun owner - his mom.
62 posted on
12/19/2012 11:38:05 AM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Dr. Sivana
They weren’t his guns. They were stolen by him. Obama can fix that; if you have kids no guns!
72 posted on
12/19/2012 12:26:38 PM PST by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: Dr. Sivana
The facts are being ignored. He stole the guns. New background checks would not change this.
with Obamacare the government will have access to all medical records...this could go be a slippery slope if they start using medical info beyond health care.
79 posted on
12/19/2012 1:34:33 PM PST by
opentalk
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson