[Fireone]

I agree, and stated it in a thread soon after the incident.
The narrative was changed to fit the agenda...painting a massacre with an “assault weapon”. Too many inconsistent stories coming out, and I don’t put much credence in the ME’s conclusion. He was told what to say, it’s quite clear to me.

[jboot]

I've become accustomed to never being informed of the actual motive and given a vague or conflicting sequence of events when notorious mass murders occur. But under the regime we don't even get basic facts.

I's been four days since the shooting. By now CSI has recovered and cataloged every particle of evidence; every gun, round, spent case, glass shard and blood drop has been cataloged and photographed. Someone knows exactly how many weapons, what kind they were and how many rounds were fired from each one. The perp is dead, so there is no need to worry about contaminating the jury. The only reason that there is any uncertainty of facts is because someone is spinning them for effect.

And what happened to the bullet-proof vest? On Friday all outlets were reporting that the shooter had a bullet-proof vest. And what of the second man in black that was arrested in the woods behind the school, who said to the reporters as he was led away in cuffs "I didn't do it." Who was that? Reporters supposedly saw this happen and even got a quote. Was this story just made up, like the vest? What else about this story is made up?