[Pox]

So, do you advocate banning video games on the grounds that a few bad apples just might possibly be affected by them?

I surely wouldn’t and I don’t state my opinion from an ideological viewpoint.

Your “logic” would be no different than those who call for banning guns since a few demented individuals use them to commit atrocities regardless of the fact that tens of millions of gun owners are law abiding citizens who don’t run around murdering people.

[WilliamIII]

So, do you advocate banning video games

No, but I’d favor a law establishing tort liability for their producers. The makers of other potentially dangerous products are subject to being sued for damages if their products result in harm. The rich conscience-free folks who produce these blood-spattered games shouldn’t be exempt from product liability litigation.

[Darnright]

> Your “logic” would be no different than those who call for banning guns since a few demented individuals use them to commit atrocities regardless of the fact that tens of millions of gun owners are law abiding citizens who don’t run around murdering people. <

The right to keep and bear arms is enshrined in our Bill of Rights.

The “right” to video games? Not so much.

(And I am not necessarily calling to ban the genre, just pointing out that banning a form of amusement is in no way equal to gutting the 2nd Amendment.)