It would have saved her life and that of 20 others. So sad
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Well her NOT securing them probably sped up the inevitable but it sounds like you are ‘placing the blame solely’ on her for the carnage. Even you said you would ‘consider’ keeping them locked up.
Again, the gun(s) did nothing but become a tool, and she sped up the process due to the accessibility but since we still don’t have all the facts etc, what would cause him to storm the school?
“They” had her at the school, his daughter at the school, he had an accomplice, he was buzzed in, he ‘fought’ his way in, when all these reports are sifted out then we will have a better idea of what actually happened, right now ‘they’ are engaged in who can put out what first - ‘damn the facts, we got a scoop’ - .
I guess we should have a ‘cooling period’ before discussing the days events as it takes a day or two to get the true facts, LIKE IT ALWAYS did, but before it wasn’t required to sift through the rumors until the facts came out.
This whole thing was a tragedy.
I m merely suggesting that if one thinks they have an unstable family member, that they may want to restrict access to their firearms.
Yet they may not. And she did nt.