[Blackirish]

I think this lady was in deep denial. Kinda like people who own wild chimps or pitbulls. There’s reports in the British press folks knew he was really disturbed. I don’t doubt them. No one has rage li8ke this without showing some red flags.

I’m going to say something no one on this site wants to hear DO...this is a watershed moment for gun control. If someone wants a gun buy it now. The 2nd amendment is going to be amended.

[BunnySlippers]

I agree with you BIG TIME. Going to my gun shop next week.

[socialism_stinX]

The second amendment won’t be amended. That’s not going to happen. Most of the state legislatures have to approve a constitutional amendment and that’s not going to happen in the foreseeable future.

[DoughtyOne]

I think this lady was in deep denial. Kinda like people who own wild chimps or pitbulls. There’s reports in the British press folks knew he was really disturbed. I don’t doubt them. No one has rage li8ke this without showing some red flags.

I wouldn't be at all surprised.  You could easily be right.

I’m going to say something no one on this site wants to hear DO...this is a watershed moment for gun control. If someone wants a gun buy it now. The 2nd amendment is going to be amended.

I'm not convinced of it.  When these issues come up, Democrats have sometimes surprised me with their responses.  Note the federal assault weapons ban that was allowed to expire.

Here the guy didn't even use an 'assault weapon'.  When all is said and done, there's very little grounds to do anything here.  What are they going to do, banish all handguns and rifles?  Will they banish all semi-automatics?  Will they ban anything other than a single-shot weapon?

And what would they base any of this on, related to this situation?

How do you defend yourself against two or more armed men with a single-shot weapon?  Either we have a right to protect ourselves or we don't.

Democrats from hunting states are headed into a buzz saw here.