Excellent. As long as you know, the difference between you and a liberal is only in what kind of gigantic govt.
Your hallucination of "gigantic" government which you imagine to be desired by social conservatives might be justified if any of us were seeking the arrest, conviction, fining and incarceration of those engaged in what homosexuals somehow imagine to be sex (namely the entry of the male reproductive organ into the nether end of the digestive system of a complementary disordered male who is somehow thrilled to be so entered). Most states have "legalized" such perversions or their lesbian equivalents long since on the basis that most Americans don't really need to have government running a bedroom police operation. If you know of any significant facts proving this paragraph wrong, please specify the details and facts.
Likewise, the laws as to men (pitchers) anally entering women as homosexual men enter homosexual men (catchers).
There may still be laws against "sex" with household pets, barnyard animals, space aliens arriving by flying saucer, twelvesomes, polygamous "marriages" and what not. If so, there seems little enthusiasm for expending public resources on such misbehavior.
So much for "gigantic" government as to such issues!
OTOH, the simulation of male on male anal "sex" on flatbed trailers as they pass St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York or similar venues, public sexual intercourse (actual or faux as practiced by perverts), public nudity, laws requiring acceptance of the rampaging delusions of "gay activists" as though those delusions were marriage together with all the benefits attendant thereto and a load of taxpayer money for medical and pension benefits for pervert "significant others" of whatever species or shackups of whatever species is a genuine threat of gigantic and growing government at the expense of the 98% of taxpayers who are normal. If your response has something to do with "equality" then you are resorting to the primary driving force and propaganda device for the development of "gigantic" government favorably as your excuse. Neverminding the moral issues, you would be favoring a substantial increase in government spending in subsidy of faggotry. What kind of liberal does that make you?
How about gummint skewels training innocent young children to believe that there is nothing particularly wrong or disordered about faggotry? Or training them in "fisting?" My answer to such problems is to abolish PS 666 and save taxpayers a terrific amount of money, defund the NEA and AFT and their Demonrat patrons and cut local government on average by about 50% and save substantial spending on a state and national level as well. To say nothing of the entertainment provided by outraged liberals at the closing of the leftist training academies and their separation from our tax dollars.