Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum
From a companion article:


The Government Accountability Office said in May that taxpayers could end up making a $15.1-billion profit from the bailout. The estimate depended on how well AIG's stock performed and when the Treasury sold its remaining shares. The GAO's projection did not take into account the government's cost to subsidize AIG since 2008, which the agency did not calculate.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/24/business/la-fi-aig-fed-bailout-20120824


Once again, William Dudley is lying through his teeth. The only entity that made a profit off of this was Goldman Sachs - Dudley's former employer.

10 posted on 12/11/2012 6:16:43 AM PST by Hoodat ("As for God, His way is perfect" - Psalm 18:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hoodat
The GAO's projection did not take into account the government's cost to subsidize AIG since 2008, which the agency did not calculate.

Subsidize? They bought stock, they sold stock, they made a profit. What subsidy?

The only entity that made a profit off of this was Goldman Sachs - Dudley's former employer.

LOL!

11 posted on 12/11/2012 5:34:26 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson