Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

They didn’t come up with the 4.5 billion age estimate from radiometric dating techniques.


42 posted on 12/06/2012 11:08:16 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: DManA

I left out an important word

radiometric dating techniques ALONE.


46 posted on 12/06/2012 11:10:29 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: DManA
They didn’t come up with the 4.5 billion age estimate from radiometric dating techniques.

Then the USGS lied to me.

What is this secret method they used, and blamed on radiometrics?

47 posted on 12/06/2012 11:11:15 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

No, actually you’re right! they pulled it out of thin air. Then proceeded to “look” for ways to support it.

They pick the “results” they want from many samples.

None of the radiometric methods “check” themselves nor cross checked with other isotropic samples.


184 posted on 12/10/2012 8:23:56 AM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson