Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rubio: “There is no scientific debate on the age of the earth”
Salon.com ^ | 12/5/2012 | Jillian Rayfield

Posted on 12/06/2012 9:47:52 AM PST by ksen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-279 last
To: kimtom
How cretarded!

You have nothing but bluster and ignorance and the very tired and trite argument that any science you disagree with is “evolution” and “atheistic” and anyone who doesn't believe the same as you is not a Christian, not righteous, and going to hell. You cannot argue against a scientific theory without making it an argument against atheism, and attacking the faith of anyone who disagrees with your wacky and useless creationism.

You can make your bed with the Islamists and the ignorant. I find myself in good company with the Pope and millions of other Christians who are not such ignorant zealots.

261 posted on 12/14/2012 12:16:15 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

There is absolutely nothing that needs to be predicted that isn’t already predicted in the Bible.

There is no one that can predict anything but God.

You’ve made a complete fool of yourself with the rubbish you post.


262 posted on 12/14/2012 2:25:42 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Oil companies need to predict where oil can be found. Drug companies need to predict the behavior of therapies. Chemists need to predict reactions. Etc etc.

The reason why science is useful and can be applied in technology is that God made a predictable universe that obeys physical laws.


263 posted on 12/14/2012 4:40:48 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Oil companies need to predict where oil can be found. Drug companies need to predict the behavior of therapies. Chemists need to predict reactions. Etc etc.

The reason why science is useful and can be applied in technology is that God made a predictable universe that obeys physical laws.


264 posted on 12/14/2012 4:50:35 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

You are making a bigger dip$hit of your self every minute.

Your disrespect for the fact that every productive useful scientist in this world has been a creationist is just showing what you’re made of (the stuff you’re dipping)


265 posted on 12/14/2012 5:02:08 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Very few scientists after 1870 were creationists. Einstein wasn’t. Bohr wasn’t. Heisenberg wasn’t. Oppenheimer wasn’t. No predictive or useful science is based on creationism. Creationism is useless.


266 posted on 12/14/2012 5:13:02 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Einstein’s declaration that he was a creationist has been posted here numerous times.

You are just a common missile mouth liar.

Very few productive scientists are not creationists.


267 posted on 12/14/2012 9:07:38 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Spinoza’s God is one who creates through physical laws, not one who did so a few thousand years ago utilizing miracles. Einstein was a proponent of Spinoza’s God. And Einstein used science to predict how much gravity would bend light. Your postulate that science is not predictive is so stupid and ignorant I can only laugh at your expense.


268 posted on 12/15/2012 9:43:01 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Your constant reliance on misrepresenting everyone’s posts has disclosed your nature to all.

There is no question that honest, objective research can yield information.

But your position is that false, inobjectively bised propagandization masquerading as science is able to produce useful information, and that is a lie, no matter how much you cling to it.


269 posted on 12/15/2012 12:06:50 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Sorry that creationism is useless instead of useful and predictive like science. Crying about it and lying about Einstein isn’t going to help. But feel free to cry some more! Your useless outrage and idiotic lies are amusing.


270 posted on 12/15/2012 4:35:09 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

You’re the one that’s crying,

And if I were you I would too, just before doing the honorable thing.


271 posted on 12/15/2012 9:17:34 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Must be rough being a geocentrist eccentric who doesn’t understand the predictive power of science. But crying about it to me isn’t going to help. I find it amusing though!!!! ;)


272 posted on 12/15/2012 9:27:00 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I just stumbled on this thread. People really believe the earth was created in six days ? That the Bible is a literal scientific tract and not ancient allegories?


273 posted on 12/15/2012 9:38:04 PM PST by Blackirish (Forward Comrades!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

Anyone that doesn’t believe the Bible is headed to an unthinkable eternal disaster.

All the evidence affirms the six day creation, and believing the deceivers forces you to partake of their calamity. The expansion rate required for the six day creation exactly fits the observable astronomical conditions. Remember, expansion affects ALL of the dimensions, including time.

Doesn’t seem like a particularly hard choice to me.


274 posted on 12/16/2012 4:05:02 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

[ Yawn ]


275 posted on 12/17/2012 3:45:54 AM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

[ Yawn ]


276 posted on 12/17/2012 3:46:01 AM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
aal-MEnnn Dreammmmmm,

Did not answer any more of my questions, “it” is a loser.
and I must assume serves the “horned” god.

I would not WASTE time, since “it”is not interested in Truth, nor can sustain a productive arguments.

Good Job though

277 posted on 12/17/2012 3:52:30 AM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
Go back and read earlier posts about geology on this thread. Sound arguments have already been submitted.

Thanks

278 posted on 12/17/2012 3:55:05 AM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“...And if I were you I would too, just before doing the honorable thing....”

LOL
very funny!!

This Lib thinks it is winning while burning in lava.
Like Gollem (in movie)


279 posted on 12/17/2012 5:57:03 AM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-279 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson