Just like Qaddaffi said.
We helped the underdog jihadists in Libya.
We helped the underdog jihadists in Egypt.
We are thinking about helping the underdog jihadists in Syria.
The underdog insurrection in Iran aimed at jihadists we watched die on the streets.
The pattern is really easy to spot.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yep. Now, talking points are being lined up for Syria intervention.
First, chemical weapons in Syria. Now today:
Syria loads chemical weapons into bombs; military awaits Assad’s order [NYT]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2966016/posts
Does that mean that now that the MB and Al Qaeda are in place and fortified, US/NATO must go in and help this endangered and suffering population so that they can depose Assad and hold a democratic election?
Yep. Soon Obama will start helping the Syrian opposition so the Syrians can have a “democratic election.” After that, the chemical weapons will be out of Assad’s hands and into those of the underdog jihadists, except at that point the jihadists will be the new “democratically elected” government of Syria.
Expect the administration to be “concerned” that the weapons they gave to the opposition may have ended up with Al Qaeda. And the administration will be “surprised” when the new government turns out to be a radical Islamist terrorist-supporting totalitarian regime.
It has to be intentional. I can’t believe that the administration and the intelligence agencies are too dumb to see that all of these revolutions are merely serving to put radical Islamists in power and give them direct control over military assets.