True, ACORN may not technically exist anymore in name, but even when it did exist it effectively went under several different names at the same New Orleans address. So there is little doubt that quite a number of ACORN-like organizations still exist working with the Obama campaign and the DNC to pull off significant, if not massive, voter fraud with refined and even more "efficient" techniques by targeting 'Rat-controlled locales in swing states.
So, contrary to the gloating Dummy author of the posted article, it doesn't really matter what the names of organizations are if a bunch of them effectively work hand-in-hand to pull off the same kind of sleazy shenanigans to fix the outcome of a presidential election.
Since the election we've seen a 5 point increase in Democratic identification to 44%, and a 5 point decrease in Republican identification to 32%.
Really, Glass? What's the source for your numbers? Party identification numbers don't figure to change so dramatically in such a short period of time, and if they do in response to alleged election results, the changes are likely to be transitory. Why don't you cut out your gloating and needling and get real? Like explaining how the alleged national popular vote differed so significantly from the reputable pre-election polls if there was no fraud and cheating going on by the 'Rats? Do you have an alternate explanation?
Gee, I can’t understand why people would think the election was stolen...
http://www.nachumlist.com/obamavoter.htm
I think you are referring to the Gallup polls ~ and this last year they were biased beyond belief ~ possibly inadvertently, but maybe vertently! Anybody who’s been making business decisions based on Gallup data probably ought to reconsider ~ seriously ~ check http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2965660/posts?page=155#155
More important than the reputable pre-election polls is the gap in crowd enthusiasm. The Dems, with their candidates in the room, were acting beaten. The GOPers, with their candidates in the room, were acting energized. There’s probably also a lot of forensic evidence of voter fraud on the district-by-district level, but that would take an investigation with tools that the average freeper does not possess. But the reports of districts going 99 or 100% for Obama tend to support this hypothesis.
The reputable polls showed Obama winning. Polls showing Romney ahead in swing states were unweighted and rats had higher turnout as predicted by the reputable polls. Here in Virginia the rats got their blacks to the polls (Petersburg City) while white coal miners and their families stayed home (Tazewell county). Most of the data is here: http://electionresults.virginia.gov click on President then on local results. Then compare to demographics for each county or city. You will see 50% turnout in Tazewell and 60% in Petersburg.
Thanks for the ping!