Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I wanted the first few sentences to tell me why public nudity is wrong. No such luck. Finally the author says it’s because it distinguishes us from animals who wear no clothes, and therefore seeing an animal’s genitals is normal and seeing ours is not. Hey - I seldom see animials’ genitals. They are mostly hidden by fur and their location between the legs.

I don’t believe in public nudity but the article was a waste of my time. Perhaps my expectations were too high.


11 posted on 12/04/2012 8:03:44 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cymbeline
I don’t believe in public nudity but the article was a waste of my time. Perhaps my expectations were too high.

And I was hoping that the author would elaborate on his equating, in the first paragraph: human genitals, men's chests, and women's chests; and maybe indicate whether I (as a man) am wrong to go about topless when performing yardwork on hot summer days, but no luck!

I'm not sure, but I get the impression that he thinks that's wrong, too. (Maybe I could get a "National Geographic Exemption"?)

Regards,

14 posted on 12/04/2012 8:10:33 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson