I have to admit that drawing the distinction between the Ordnances of Secession and the Declarations of the Reasons of Secession is technically correct - even if it is just a half-step above playing spelling nazi.
If he he wishes to indulge in leftist hair-splitting exercises then I would respond that the ambiguity he presents in “Therefore, any notion that these documents were formal, legal explanations is totally false” is itself false because he failed to explicitly define which exact documents he was referring to with respect that that particular response.
*rollseyes*
Try putting this together in your mind:
However, four states published their reasoning in individual state decrees, which of course, were not legally representative of the state actions.
Therefore, any notion that these documents were formal, legal explanations is totally false.
At some point, you either need to simply stop posting or just admit that the facts are more rational than your most recent post.