Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman

London To Sydney Spaceflight Edges Closer

‘A British company believes it is a step closer to building a rocket plane that would get from London to Sydney within four hours.’

4:20pm UK, Wednesday 28 November 2012
Thomas Moore, Health And Science Correspondent

(excerpt)

‘British engineers have successfully tested a key component of an engine that could power a spaceplane from London to Sydney in under four hours.

The engineers have hailed it as the biggest breakthrough in aerospace propulsion “since the invention of the jet engine”.

Oxfordshire-based Reaction Engines hope to build a rocket plane called Lapcat that would take off from an ordinary runway, reach speeds of around 19,000mph in the upper atmosphere and then land like a normal jet aircraft.

While still in the atmosphere, the plane’s Sabre engine would combine on-board hydrogen fuel with oxygen that it “breathes” from the air. But the air needs to be super-cooled for the engine to work.

The company has now demonstrated a lightweight heat exchanger that pre-cools incoming air from 1000 degrees Celsius to minus 150 degrees in 1/100th of a second - six times faster than the blink of an eye - without blocking pipes with a layer of frost.

Alan Bond, who founded the company and led the research, said: “The team has been trying to solve this problem for over 30 years and we’ve finally done it.

“The Sabre engine has the potential to revolutionise our lives in the 21st century in the way the jet engine did in the 20th Century.”

The tests were validated by the European Space Agency.

Science minister David Willetts MP said: “This is a remarkable achievement for a remarkable company. Building on years of unique engineering know-how, Reaction Engines has shown the world that Britain remains at the forefront of technological innovation and can get ahead in the global race.”

The Sabre engine could also power a re-useable rocket plane called Skylon that could carry a large payload into space, reducing the cost of launching a satellite by more than 10 times.

By using available oxygen in the atmosphere it would reduce the amount of fuel it needs to carry, so it could reach orbit in a single stage. Current rockets require costly multiple stages which are jettisoned during their ascent.’

http://news.sky.com/...ht-edges-closer


2 posted on 11/29/2012 9:55:21 AM PST by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the scotsman

Is it similar to the SCRAMJET?.........


3 posted on 11/29/2012 10:00:59 AM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman
The company has now demonstrated a lightweight heat exchanger that pre-cools incoming air from 1000 degrees Celsius to minus 150 degrees in 1/100th of a second - six times faster than the blink of an eye - without blocking pipes with a layer of frost.

Wow! That's quite remarkable. I would have said "that's impossible" but it sounds like they have bragging rights.

7 posted on 11/29/2012 10:12:44 AM PST by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman
get from London to Sydney within four hours

Like the SST, it'll be too pricey/noisy for commercial flight

It'll be more like getting from Edwards AFB to Benghazi within four hours

8 posted on 11/29/2012 10:13:42 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: the scotsman

This is gotta be a scam for seeking funding, for a project they know will go nowhere, but which will keep them happily employed for a decade. In his book “Skunk Works”, Ben Rich describes his exploration of an SR-71 replacement concept that was to be hydrogen powered.

They decided it was a bad idea for a lot of reasons. A big one is demonstrated by the space shuttle. The giant external tank is mostly liquid hydrogen. Rich quickly learned you would need an enormous supply on board because they could not be refueled on a long flight. ( ie,,London to Sydney)
Also, it’s very dangerous to store and handle in large quantities. He described his trip to the national bureau of standards to meet with an expert about hydrogen and learn all he could. He describes how horrified that guy was when he asked how hard it would be to run a tank farm storing the stuff.

Hydrogen has it’s fine uses, but i doubt airliner fuel is one of them.


9 posted on 11/29/2012 10:14:39 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson