Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lou L

OT is a benefit to the employer. There are usually fixed costs both monetary and others such as regulatory, legal, training, and etc, for having an employee that are not seen in the hourly rate. These fixed costs may make it cheaper in the short run to work OT than to hire another worker.


38 posted on 11/26/2012 10:40:23 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomNotSafety
OT is a benefit to the employer. There are usually fixed costs both monetary and others such as regulatory, legal, training, and etc, for having an employee that are not seen in the hourly rate. These fixed costs may make it cheaper in the short run to work OT than to hire another worker.

Even better is having employees work overtime off the clock.

P&G did this with their hourly employees in the 1980s at one of the technical centers. Lab technicians would work past their quitting time during the week, sometimes for hours and come in on Saturdays, all for no pay. People were under pressure to do this; if you didn't, you were branded with "bad attitude". Management denied this practice, which was not consistent throughout the company, but I observed it for years.
50 posted on 11/26/2012 12:29:00 PM PST by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson