Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teflon9
"independent contractors" = no benefits and even less job security. Might be good for the employer, but awful for the employee.

Companies will pay a much higher hourly rate to someone they know they can part with easily if times get tough. Being an employee, especially if a union member, does nothing but set you a maximum salary limit, regardless of your ability.

Job security is a nonsensical concept in these times - there is none.

33 posted on 11/26/2012 10:27:51 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Jeeves

That differential also takes into account the costs that the contractor takes on. Add all the costs normally covered by a proper employer and you make up for those gains.

To suggest that job security is a non sensical concept (and that one should blindly accept indirect work) is to bring the worst of Europe’s hiring practices to the United States. That is, temporary employment promotes a harmful detachment from work.

All of that said, hiring is a business decision - nothing more.


55 posted on 11/26/2012 2:23:55 PM PST by setha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson