I haven’t read the responses yet, but I anticipate much celebration by my fellow FReepers. What I failed to see in the article is any coverage of this individual causing personal or property damage that harmed another citizen. If anyone has any additional information I hope to see it posted.
Until I see any clarification, I find it disgusting that we would celebrate the improsinment of anyone for life that has NOT caused personal or property damage.
This is one of the reasons we have so many idiot drivers on the road. People now think that the only dangerous driving is DWI and that they can just be on auto pilot without paying attention. Why? Well, we very rarely see the charge of vehicular manslaughter without some BAC.
I say that anyone that causes personal or property damage with their vehicle should be charged with the full extent of the law. Any driver at fault! Anyone!
Well, according to your way of thinking, we should let everyone out of prison who attempted to kill someone but didn’t. After all, no one was killed, right? What about armed bank robbers who hold up banks? Just let them walk since, after all, no one was shot and there was no property damage?
I had a childhood friend killed by a drunk driver. He was push starting a car and a drunk driver, with his headlights off, was being pursued by police and rammed my friend, cutting him in half.
He had EIGHT chances. He was BREAKING THE LAW. What else do you need. I really don’t care about anything else you have to say.
I WILL celebrate his being someone’s wife in prison.
exactly right.