Several members of the activist community he belongs to, both online and offline, have questioned Preska’s ability to conduct a fair trial.
“Judge Preska by proxy is a victim of the very crime she intends to judge Jeremy Hammond for. Judge Preska has failed to disclose the fact that her husband is a client of Stratfor and recuse herself from Jeremy’s case, therefore violating multiple sections of Title 28 of the United States Code,” reads a press release from Anonymous.
“Judge Loretta Preska’s impartiality is compromised by her husband’s involvement with Stratfor and a clear prejudice against Hammond exists, as evident by her statements,” it continues. “Without justice being freely, fully, and impartially administered, neither our persons, nor our rights, nor our property, can be protected.”
The nerve of these guys! They routinely and deliberately violate the law and then complain about its impartial administration.
My thoughts as well. If they wanted our persons, our rights, our property, to be protected then they would be negating protection.
By that standard, no one could ever be convicted of crimes against humanity. You'd never be able to find a suitably impartial judge or jury.