Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
Goes against the “uncomfortable in their poverty” principle.

Except they aren't uncomfortable. They are provided with food, shelter and walking around money. But maybe not as much as they would like. Which is what would motivate them to take a job that would provide them with more. It does not motive them to take a job that will provide them with the same or less.

False premise to assume that the state is going to pay them anyway

No, it is a true premise. They are already on the dole.

And mixing (nominally?) private business and state in that fashion would be a return to fascism.

It is already so mixed. Has been for a number of decades. And if that is your idea of fascism then the entire EU is Fascist. Hmmmm... come to think of it you might be right as far as that goes.

13 posted on 11/23/2012 8:49:38 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Fate plays chess and you don't find out until too late that he's been using two queens all along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

You’re not getting it as far as the “uncomfortable in their poverty” principle. That was something that Benjamin Franklin put forth as the means to spur people out of their poverty. What societies such as these in the EU are doing (and of course our own so-called “Great Society”) is the very opposite. And the Brandenburg labor minister already acknowledged that there are enough dole recipients that would not take a job of their own free will.


14 posted on 11/23/2012 9:03:07 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson