Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
One of the victims apparently has a concealed handgun license.

Why would the author write this? Wouldn't it make more sense to say, "One of the victims had a handgun."

Stupid liberal journalist idiots. Regardless whether he had a permit or not, this was a pretty clear case of self defense. The victim didn't use the permit to kill the perps, he used a gun.

Just dumb.

3 posted on 11/21/2012 8:16:13 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia

How many cop shows on TV featured the line”you got a license for that” whenever the private detective or citizen used or showed a gun?

The socialists just can’t get the idea of a free people able to decide things for themselves without permission.


5 posted on 11/21/2012 8:47:55 AM PST by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rarestia

Not necessarily. It shows that individuals who are legal gun owners are more likely to use their weapons responsibly (i.e. in self defense in this case) than individuals who use weapons to commit crimes.


7 posted on 11/21/2012 9:01:17 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rarestia

However, the way it is written is pretty funky and awkward. You’re right. He didn’t shoot the perp with his license, he shot him with his gun.


8 posted on 11/21/2012 9:05:49 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson