Bam hides terror truth

nypost.com ^ | 11/18/2012 | Michael Goodwin

[gotribe]

Finally, someone raises the impeachment possibility.

[MarkL]

It really doesn't matter... It really is astounding to me, who remembers the "joke" of the media in authoritarian countries, like Cuba, North Korea, China, and even the old Soviet Union, I really never thought I would live to see the day where the so called "media" in the US isn't just completely controlled by the government, but they will actively work to hide any "mistakes" by the Obama regime. Anybody else remember George Stephanopolis correcting Obama when he referred to his "Muslim religion," and George said "don't you mean "Christian religion?"

The transition from "media" to "ministry of propaganda" is complete.

Mark

[little jeremiah]

Some people still aren't getting it. Obama's decisions have not failed. His policies have not been unsuccessful. His goals just aren't the goals that some people assume them to be. He's a different kind of president.

That's it in a nutshell. Huge billboards should be made with that statment and put up all over the country.

[21twelve]

The following link is to an old FR thread, about an even older conservative booklet called “The Revolution Was”, written in 1938 about FDR and the New Deal. It is ALL happening again - amazingly, chillingly so. Only worse.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts

An Excerpt:

Worse outwitted were those who kept trying to make sense of the New Deal from the point of view of all that was implicit in the American scheme, charging it therefore with contradiction, fallacy, economic ignorance, and general incompetence to govern.

But it could not be so embarrassed and all that line was wasted, because, in the first place, it never intended to make that kind of sense, and secondly, it took off from nothing that was implicit in the American scheme. It took off from a revolutionary base.

The design was European. Regarded from the point of view of revolutionary technic it made perfect sense. Its meaning was revolutionary and it had no other. For what it meant to do it was from the beginning consistent in principle, resourceful, intelligent, masterly in workmanship, and it made not one mistake......

Having passed this crisis, the New Deal went on from one problem to another, taking them in the proper order, according to revolutionary technic; and if the handling of one was inconsistent with the handling of another, even to the point of nullity, that was blunder in reverse.

The effect was to keep people excited about one thing at a time, and divided, while steadily through all the uproar of outrage and confusion a certain end, held constantly in view, was pursued by main intention.

The end held constantly in view was power.

[little jeremiah]

The transition from "media" to "ministry of propaganda" is complete.

Yes indeed. And that is why fewer and fewer people are watching Teev and why venerable big newspapers are laying off, firing, downsizing and the like.

[little jeremiah]

Thanks for the ping and excerpt.