Geez....didn’t he used to be on our side?
Did he figure the dark side is more profitable?
This guy is a pathetic nutball. His site is as bad, if not worse than the DUmp. Sane people don’t post over there. I’m ashamed that I used to read it years ago. It was back during Rathergate. Over the years he has become nothing but a Muslim loving, anti-Semite.
I wonder if Charles Johnson thinks Watergate was a “fake scandal”. Probably not, as it concerned a Repub and not his boy-king.
This person things thinks these are the type of things that make for a fake scandal
1. obama administration ignored pleas regarding Benghazi security for months
2. Ambassador Stevens was requesting more security the day he died
3. No backup was sent after we determined the annex was under attack
4. We told people nearby to stand-down rather than help
5. obama claims we couldn’t respond in time (doesn’t even grasp the ramifications of our enemies knowing this might be true)
6. obama refuses to recognize in public what took place at the annex
7. obama has his people go out and lie
8. obama lied
This still doesn’t answer the question why adequate action wasn’t taken that might have prevented the death of four victims of an attack by Muslim terrorists.
Holy cow. (shaking head)
LGF ignores the holes blown in the consulate walls weeks ealier
LGF ignores the policeman who photographed the grounds earlier in the day
LGF ignores the caliber of weapons that were available for this “spontaneous” attack
etc
little green goofballs.
“the right wing hack masquerading as a Washington Post blogger”
How does one masquerade as a blogger? Either you are one or you’re not. It isn’t like being a reporter, which is supposed to be a profession. “Blogger” connotes amateurs sitting in their underwear in the basement of their mother’s house, if anything.
The libtards know fake scandals....
....Iran/Contra....Rathergate....Valerie Plame..
....voter intimidation
He tries to present scandalmongers as promoting a flaws dichotomy between the video and a terror attack by saying it was a terror attack motivated by revenge for the video. Either he hasn’t been paying much attention, has a learning disability, or woefully underestimates what it takes to win an argument. Because the real problem with the White House’s initial response is that they pretended it was a “spontaneous” outbreak instead of a planned attack.
Oh, and by the way, I don’t care what the attackers themselves said about the video. The fact that it took place on 9/11 is at least as important as any other motivation, if not infinitely more. Only an idiot can think otherwise.
Leftwingers are proof that a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
"We will only defend the lives of our diplomats and other assets if they are being attacked by a terrorist group with official terrorist credentials." - 0bama Zombie Policy
I thought Petraeus said (it was behind closed doors, I guess only the people in the room know)that we were trying not to let on that we knew that it was Al Quada , somehow to fake them out, to what end? Like there was going to be an immediate counter-strike? Where was it by October 15 ( five weeks after the fact) when the NYT had finally put together the umpteenth cover story that Green Footballs quotes? Can't take the stain out of Obama running off to Las Vegas as though nothing had happened; his reference to "bumps in the road;" (one is reminded of Braddock's final resting place courtesy of George Washington on the retreat from the disastrous battle of the Monongahela, 1755); nor overlook the fact that the Fort Hood shooting has been called "workplace violence" over the obviously pre-meditated terror attack it was. It has been Obama's trademark throughout his Presidency to refuse to call "the war against us, " "Moslem extremist terror." If you missed that , Green Footballs, then no wonder you have no idea what happened here either, so just shut up.
So, Obama & cohorts played down the after-action report by CIA that this was an organized AQ associate attack on our Mission at Benghazi. The cover story was a demonstration incited by a video. Ooooookay.
How did anyone from Obama to Susan Rice to Hillary plan to play down this central, unchanged, decisive fact, known by Obama on down within 24 hours of the attack:
Two Americans were KIA by mortar fire at 0400.
Why isn’t the media, McCain, and everyone hammering that fact home at every opportunity?
Obammy promised to “get the guys responsible” for it.
How’s that manhunt going? Do we even have their names yet?
Obama got Osama and Hillary bragged about the war crime murder of Gaddafi.
LGF has gone RATsh!t crazy.
Stuck on stupid and still whoring out the White House meme that this was caused by an unseen Youtube clip.
Little green pooballs.
I'm pretty sure the attackers already know who the attackers are, so tipping them off shouldn't have been an issue.