Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainlion

If you want green energy there’s nothing cheaper than hydroelectric. Fortunately my state is relaxing the regulations for retrofits on hundreds of dams in the state.

Its like anything else, cost effectiveness is related to availability.


10 posted on 11/17/2012 10:59:26 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
Colorado? Loveland had a hydro plant that got destroyed by the big Thompson flood. It was quite effective. Longmont had a hydro plant that they planned on closing when the operators retired. It generated more than enough to power the water plant as some other utilities. Some of these do not even require a dam, just a diversion structure. There is a greater energy density with hydro than with wind.
18 posted on 11/17/2012 11:30:34 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

And during a season of low precipitation, with competing interests from agriculture, hydroelectricity can also be scaled back.


37 posted on 11/17/2012 1:44:20 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson