To: mountainlion
If you want green energy there’s nothing cheaper than hydroelectric. Fortunately my state is relaxing the regulations for retrofits on hundreds of dams in the state.
Its like anything else, cost effectiveness is related to availability.
10 posted on
11/17/2012 10:59:26 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: cripplecreek
Colorado? Loveland had a hydro plant that got destroyed by the big Thompson flood. It was quite effective. Longmont had a hydro plant that they planned on closing when the operators retired. It generated more than enough to power the water plant as some other utilities. Some of these do not even require a dam, just a diversion structure. There is a greater energy density with hydro than with wind.
18 posted on
11/17/2012 11:30:34 AM PST by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: cripplecreek
And during a season of low precipitation, with competing interests from agriculture, hydroelectricity can also be scaled back.
37 posted on
11/17/2012 1:44:20 PM PST by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson