But you go ahead and judge them too. Like anybody cares what you think.
As if anybody cares what you think.
But why not actually engage the argument? You said, in effect, that the clergy shouldn't be held to a higher moral standard than the general population. I countered with clear Scriptural guidance that such a position simply isn't correct - indeed, that St. Paul himself makes it abundantly clear that the clergy is held to a much higher standard than the average person.
Instead of admitting you were wrong, you simply retreat into name-calling.
Which raises the question: are you a rational human being interested in arriving at truth in honest discussions, or are you rather an emoting poser?
It's looking to me like your an emoting poser, but I'd be very pleased to have you disprove that by addressing the argument.