that’s a good question
I bet even the Libyan Terrorists Attackers were scratching their head over that one:
“Hey, Abdul, Mo’- they are saying we were pissed over a video- what video? do you know anything about some video?”
I think Hillary Clinton did it.
Good point. Round them all up for testimony before an Indepedennt Prosecutor. Watergate redux, only this is for an actual high crime.
Definitely the State Dept. The vid was tracked back to belonging to a contractor who works for the State Dept.
Valerie Jarrett , of course .....
That was exactly my first thought, too - Huma Abedin.
Obama had to approve the lie and cover up. He repeated it through the following two weeks including his big deal speech at the UN.
Just a side note on the Benghazi topic while I think of it.
Notice how...”fog of war” shows up in some articles on this topic?
Hillary was the first one I heard say that.
These 3 put their little brains together to hatch the cover story: Obama, Jarrett and Rice.
And, do you remember at first they were trying to tie the Terry Jones Koran burning guy from Florida to it? They were.
Look at this Daily beast article that was rather quickly published on Sept 12 with a link to the you tube video pushing this Terry Jones connection.
It was total ploy using known suspect/scapegoats and using a friendly media outlet, Daily Beast (and others) to get this make believe ruse story out immediately when it happened.
This stinks all over the place. This was probably an open ended ruse developed well before Benghazi to be used when needed.
Huma’s parents are respected muslim-brotherhood supporters in Egypt where we soaw supposedly ‘video protest’, not remotely related to Benghazi terrorist attack.
You’re making the error of thinking that Hillary or State has any say in how things are done.
This decision came out of Chicago. It was, after all, primarily a political issue, not one of national security.
(did I forget the /sarc tag?)
Mr. niteowl77
Not a chance.
An excerpt of the video was dubbed in Arabic and shown on Egyptian TV on September 9 by Sheikh Khalad Abdalla, who has a big bump on his forehead.
No question, it helped to gin up protest demonstrations in a variety of wog locales. However, Benghazi was not among them, as any moron reading the New York Times or the Boston Globe would have known a day or two later. Benghazi was a military assault, not a protest demonstration gone out of control.
We have, for example, the testimony of Ethan Chorin, who was in Benghazi with Dr. Thomas Burke of Mass General, Boston. They were there to assist Libyan doctors in setting up an Emergency Room operation at the Benghazi Medical Center. They and the Libyan doctors were slated to meet with Ambassador Stevens Wednesday morning, the 12th.
On the evening of the 11th, Chorin was on the phone with the Ambassador's security detail arranging the meeting, when the call ended abruptly with a shout of "We've got a problem here". Then Chorin and Burke were left to hole up in their hotel listening to sounds of the distant violence. And the Libyan doctors ended up treating the Ambassador unsucessfully at the BMC for severe asphyxia.
IOW, no demonstration, no build-up. Just a sudden surprise attack by Al Qaeda. Which we now know would not have been a surprise, but for the incompetence of the Obama / Clinton State Department.
And no need to muddy the waters with bogus conspiracy theories. The facts are good enough!
Of course she would have to have known about a nondescript video to blame it on.....but if you have commissioned such a vid to be made,it would be right in your back pocket when you needed it.
That would mean collusion..hmmmmmmmmm
One of three things happened at Benghazi:
1) Muslims, irate over a YouTube video, attacked the embassy and killed Americans.
2) Muslims planned an executed a terrorist attack on the embassy, killing Americans.
3) Muslims attacked our embassy and killed four Americans for yet-unknown sinister reasons.
We can discount reason #1, since it’s been completely and factually debunked. That leaves us with two options, both of which are devastating for Obama. If #2 is the likely scenario, that means Obama was asleep at the switch, spending his time golfing, vacationing and fundraising, all while the terrorists were planning. His actions may not be criminal but there’s no doubt what the American people would’ve thought of it (if the MSM had done their job). Obama knew it could very well cost him the election, so the blame/deflection game began.
But then there’s scenario #3. Possible gun running through Libya? A planned “October surprise” kidnapping that went wrong when two American heroes defied orders and fought back? Right now the facts have us somewhere between options #2 and #3. If it unravels and #3 is revealed, Obama will be impeached by the House. Whether or not the Senate goes along with it is another story.
Drip, drip, drip. A little more is coming out everyday.
I doubt it. How convenient that the video was made in Hollywood... My personal opinion is that this video was made by persons loyal to the Obama team as cover for an October Surprise and that is why the mystery surrounding the film maker.
Thailand
They have already destroyed Canadian speech and murder europeans that practice free speech.
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/american-muslims-want-limits-on-free-speech.html
Kansas City Muslims Want Limits on Free Speech - Sept 27, 2011
Islamic leaders in Missouri and New Jersey are calling for lawmakers to limit free speech after an anti-Muslim film sparked outrage across the world.