Posted on 11/16/2012 10:37:52 AM PST by Chi-townChief
Romney told the NAACP, of all people, that a vote for Obama was a vote for more free stuff.
nuff sed, you need not elaborate.
I don’t give a hoot about the “race” of a voter. However, I do have a GREAT DEAL OF HEARTBURN over what I consider, Ghetto voters influencing an election.
I do not think that persons that are entirely dependent on the government (local, state, or federal) for their food and sustanance (I am not talking about pensions or social security) being able to vote.
I tired to explain this to my teenage son who wondered why this group (like in Philidelphia) would vote for Mr. Obama and continued unemployment instead of Mr. Romney where there might be a chance of economic turn around. What I told my son is that this class of ghetto dwellers is not now or ever going to be interested in “employment.” All they care about is getting their government money...with NO strings attached (except that they do not work). Because they NEVER intend to get a job and EARN an income. They don’t care if the the rest of the country suffers and cannot find work.....they will continue to get their government checks whether there is 1% or 15% unemployment.
When I explained it that way, he could understand. They don’t expect (or care) Mr. Obama to help decrease the unemployment. They just expect him to keep feeding them and giving them toys. Bread and circuses!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.