“Obama, Romney, they’re both the same. Romney would have done this”.
You have just made things extremely difficult for me to treat you with any degree of respect, by the nature of your comment, which IMHO is the most blatantly stupid statement I have EVER seen on FreeRepublic
“You have just made things extremely difficult for me to treat you with any degree of respect, by the nature of your comment, which IMHO is the most blatantly stupid statement I have EVER seen on FreeRepublic”
I have to take you at your word, however, if you are a frequent reader of FR, I am suspicious of the accuracy of your statement.
Also, that’s sarcasm I posted. HEAVY sarcasm.
Romney is a gun grabber. He signed legislation into law in MA that mirrors the now sunsetted 'assault' weapons ban.
In MA...no magazine on any semi-automatic rifle can hold more than 10 rounds...handguns as well...10 rounds...except tubular rifle (.22) magazines.
No flash suppressors. No bayonet mounts. No grenade launchers, etc, etc.
That means I cannot own a stock Ruger Mini-14. Or a basic AR-15 platform rifle....and many, many others.
Basically, in MA...if you want long range stand off capability, you are relegated to a Winchester or Mossberg lever action 30-30 rifle. All because of Mitt Romney.
It might have taken him longer but Romney would have been very bad for gun owners. In my book as well, in that regard, he is no different from BHO.