“Fox News has learned he is expected to speak off-site to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Friday about his Libya report. “
What’s “off-site”?
What’s wrong with the Senate hearing room—before the public, and with cameras?
Is this going to be a secret appearance? With all the testimony kept sealed?
Not going to predict this one. Will take a wait and see, but you may have it correct. Keyword = may
http://www.kmbz.com/David-Petraeus-Personally-Investigated-Benghazi-At/14775180
Petraeus has offered two reasons for wanting to avoid testifying: Acting CIA Director Morell is in possession of all the information Petraeus gathered in conducting his review and he has more current information gathered since Petraeus’ departure; and it would be a media circus.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83835.html?hp=l1_b1
He really enjoyed his job at the CIA, it was the best job in the world, as far as he was concerned, Mansoor told CNNs Erin Burnett. He had a good relationship with the president and national security team, and he threw that all away for due to a personal failing. He is very, very down right now.
The source who attended the event was struck by how openly Broadwell spoke about Petraeus, adding that she seemed to have personal insights about the CIA director: She said he was unsure of himself sometimes. She said he was concerned about the publics perception of him.
Just heard Rush say this. paraphrased ... Testimony will support video lie.
They have to see what he will say first. Against O, we will not hear it from his lips. This is called sensored news, the commie way! You will only hear what you are allowed to hear just like the government controlled media treats the public.