Your first example is not relevant to any liberty interest, because it deals with the actions of government entities. Ideally, we would not have most of the government entities, starting with government schools.
Your second example related to obscenity and pornography statutes, including child pornography. This has historically been an area for legislation, and the fact that we have interest groups opposing any limitations on pornography does not mean it should not be an area for legislation.
I have yet to see anything in your posts, well-organized as they are, to indicate that the agenda of the “none” group comes down to anything but unlimited abortion, promotion of homosexuality, and (as “mrsmel” mentioned), “If your values are in opposition to mine, you’re a hater!!!”
I’m not disputing that this faction exists, but accommodating them doesn’t seem to me to be a legitimate interest of conservatism. If it comes down to it, the Republic will fall, and the “nones” can take their chances with Mexicans and Moslems. They might get their free abortions, since Moslems don’t care if infidels kill their offspring, but the public homosexuality is going to be a problem.
That is because you're stuck there and keep bashing away at it and will not get out of there.
Seems your mind is made up already and the record is skipping, always coming back to one thing.
Let me know when you can get away from abortion and gays and maybe we can talk about how you get a message to people.
But if you're going to be single-track like this, then trust me, you won't be able to talk to them and as they grow in number, you'll wonder why you keep losing.
I'd prefer to run a conservative candidate and actually win, thank you.