Still not understanding why Patraeus’s affair is a big deal, but Clinton’s wasn’t.
It’s not a big deal (to them), it’s an exit strategy to maintain a cover-up.
I KNOW!!!
Not defending Patraeus at all, but I about spewed my coffee this morning when I read one article that talked about how terrible it was to have someone as important as the head of the CIA be put into a position in which he could have been blackmailed!
Ding! Ding! Ding! The MSM seemed not to realize this when Mr. BJ Stainman was doing his thing.
Because Clinton had historical precedent (JFK, LBJ, etc.), and evidently
that trumps the rule of law. Anyone below the rank of CinC never gets away with it. Seems like one of those “ unwritten rules”