[sickoflibs]

RE “Save the economy under O and then you got two term Dem POTUSes who will be seen as a success and one two term Republican POTUS who will be seen as a failure. That will be the end.”
.....
I don’t buy that, not anymore. In this last election we had a President by all observations was a failure. He didn’t run on his record, yet he won. (At least it appears that way) So the converse would be possible, a success could lose as well.”

Save Obama and you got this as an argument:

1) Republicans saved the economy under President Clinton
2) Republicans killed the economy under President Bush
3) Republicans saved the economy under President Obama

So vote in another Republican so...

And it will be repeated here over and over.
We need to be spared that loser.

[sickoflibs]

HA_HA, try:

Save Obama and you got this as an argument:

1) Republicans saved the economy under President Clinton
2) Dems killed the economy under President Bush
3) Republicans saved the economy under President Obama

So vote in another Republican so...#2????

[mike_9958]

“Republicans killed the economy under President Bush”

If your going by congresses the dems killed the economy under Bush.....

Anyway it doesn’t matter the media will say it your way anyway. Remember the dems lie their asses off. If your marketing a candidate you really don’t care about results with a good number of the electorate, and the the half you lie too.

This election was eye opening. A guy won who was an abject failure. Every traditional indicator said he should of lost. Over 50% of the country doesn’t want ObamaCare, yet he still won. The nation actually turned a guy down who wasn’t a career politician.

Personally I say screw the optics / politics and do what the people who voted for you would do - that’s pretty simple. The nation is pretty conservative hopefully our reps will understand that. Elections are not based on results / records, their based on perceptions.