Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator
It would have been better than what we got. Besides, a smart man can make changes to the playbook as necessary.

Obama had a failed record. That failure could have been handled better for sure. However, Romney never laid out the choice like Reagan did. He didn't explain how Obama’s policies made the economy worse, and how he could have done it better.

People didn't feel that Obama had succeeded, but they weren't really convinced that Romney could do better.

Obama was able to successfully claim that he had the worst situation anyone ever faced since FDR. That was not true. It should have been challenged, proved false, and how Reagan style policies would have been better and could have good results.

69 posted on 11/09/2012 9:39:26 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes

I do believe in the end, many voted for the “Devil They Know.” I predicted long ago Obama would win precisely because of that.


70 posted on 11/09/2012 9:40:39 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: greeneyes

Agreed. Romney *assumed* that everybody would see through 0bama’s lies about the recession and its cause, so he failed to counteract them with such simple statements as that the recession ended more than 3 years previously, and that it was caused by Democrat housing policies. Romney should have been much harsher on 0bama’s overall competence, ethics and honesty, too.


82 posted on 11/10/2012 1:57:22 AM PST by Post Toasties (Leftists give insanity a bad name. 0bama: Four years of failure and fingerpointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson