Posted on 11/09/2012 11:21:04 AM PST by grundle
Nearly two-thirds of employers expect to see a cost hike in their health plans when the Affordable Care Act goes into effect in 2014, according to new data from the consulting firm Mercer.
Employers in the restaurant and retail industries -- those with a large number of hourly wage workers who traditionally had minimal or no health insurance -- are more likely than other companies to drop their health plans or cut worker's hours in order to maintain their already slim profit margins.
According to a Mercer survey of 1,203 employers, nearly half of retail and hospitality employers expect the health care overhaul to push up cost by at least 3 percent in 2014, with another third don't yet know what the impact will be.
Papa John's CEO John Schnatter told shareholders during a conference call last week that the health care reform will cost the company an additional 11 cents to 14 cents per pizza, which equates to 15 cents to 20 cents per order.
McDonald's Corporation (NYSE: MCD) voiced similar concerns. The world's largest restaurant chain's CFO Peter Bensen said during a conference call in late July that complying with the health care law will cost as much as $420 million annually. McDonald's will likely raise its menu prices when the law goes fully into effect in 2014 to cover the health costs, according to CFO Journal .
"With health benefit cost already rising at twice the rate of general inflation, an additional increase of 3 percent or more will be very tough for employers to absorb," Sharon Cunninghis, leader of Mercer's U.S. Employee Health & Benefits business, said in a statement.
The major provisions of the so-called Obamacare scheduled to take effect in 2014 affect employers with large numbers of part-time and low-paid workforces. For example, beginning in 2014 employers with 50 or more full-time workers -- defined as those working at least 30 hours a week -- will be required to extend coverage to all full-time employees or face possible penalties of $2,000 per employee.
Many retail and restaurant employers hover around the 50-worker threshold and feel that it would make economic sense to stay small -- cut hours or eliminate worker -- to avoid triggering the requirements of the law.
Mercer found that about 46 percent of restaurant and retail companies said they would have to change in some way once the law comes into effect, compared with 16 percent of financial-services companies.
"Extending coverage to more employees will be a significant new expense for these employers," said Tracy Watts, Mercer U.S. health care reform leader in Washington.
I wonder how many of these hardest hit are in NJ/NYC waiting on FEMA.
Or Catholics or Jews or Asians or women or Muslims.
Good luck telling that to this lady. She's the new face of half the Americans.
On the bright side, they've got their free 0bamaphones!
....And the half of what I am VERY AFRAID we could very well see, a second civil war, the “face” of the side that will DEMAND MORE from the side that is being “looted” from, or in other words, Paul robbing from Peter.
Well, of course! Paul's entitled to it - don-cha-know...
***Well if they make under 75K they will get their cost subsidized from the government***
The cost will be subsidized by those making $75,001 and up.
What an unmitigated Demo/Socialistic mess!!!
And they'll take exactly the wrong "message" out of this last election victory. He's already stating that America agrees with his worthless DOA deficit/debt reduction plan. He's already set his feet in concrete while pretending to "reach out" to Repellicans. We've been down this very same road quite recently with this arrogant prig!!!
Yep unless you are exempt form it.
At this point, how would that be worse?
Drop the benefits and increase the pay so they can pay for their own health care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.