Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law

That nonsense applies to all denominations.

This is about voter data, not whether voters are rigidly devoted and pure to whatever church they are members of.

The Catholic category is much more rigid and exclusive than the Protestant category, “Catholic” means members of that single denomination, of that single teaching, single culture, of people actually baptized into that church, and who still consider themselves as members of that church, which they are.

To be counted as “Protestant” they merely have to identify as Christian and not Catholic. They don’t have have ever to belonged to any church, or even be baptized, or they can belong to any range of churches or denominations, Black, Episcopalian, homosexual, Obama’s church, Southern Baptist, Lutherans, or whatever.


59 posted on 11/09/2012 2:06:35 PM PST by ansel12 (Todd Akin was NOT the tea party candidate, Sarah Steelman was, Brunner had tea party support also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
"This is about voter data..."

No, it is about data manipulation to prove a preconceived point, exactly what like the Global Warming crowd does. A more accurate analysis would categorize this as "more liars vote for Obama". Meanwhile, your effort to blame Catholics for all of the woes of the country, in the grand tradition of the Know-Nothings, is meaningless.

61 posted on 11/09/2012 2:20:17 PM PST by Natural Law (Jesus did not leave us a Bible, He left us a Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson