It was also in the early ballots that Allen West in Florida initially had a 2,000 point lead and then they went back and “re-counted” and West ended up with a 2,000 point deficit. That’s a net difference of 4,000 votes - the “mistakes” discovered favored the D over the R by 4,000 to 1. How does somebody “miscount” 4,000 ballots?
The Gannett site (was it USA Today?) briefly had the tally for OH’s early votes online, and I thought it was something like a 72,000-vote lead for Romney. Yet all of a sudden the results that were supposed to be from early voting had Obama way ahead. Didn’t make sense.
Nothing about this makes sense, unless there was fraud. The clueless folks are celebrating, but I think a lot of people are scratching their heads and saying something isn’t right here. The facts don’t fit right and it doesn’t feel right either.
Yeppers --
I hadn’t heard the Allen West story but that is shocking. We all know early voting was pushed on us as a way to extend the dems ability to commit fraud. Maybe they’ve just perfected it.
I wish I had noted some of the other early/absentee numbers from election night but they were all way off in favor of Obama in the swing states. I just don’t get it. The United State elections project web site has a list of all the OH absentee/early voters and total numbers adding up to 31% of the 2008 vote and they have it as last updated 11/5 before the election. If they had that why would the media not have the same info the next night and why did they start OH with a 60:40 split with a total that didn’t include more than 11% of OH’s voters, most of whom had to be Republican if you consider the 50:36:14 that even the democrats themselves reported for the party breakdown.
I need to find the total # that actually voted in person that night. Subtract that from the total votes counted and if it leaves 31% no obvious fraud but it leaves the 20% reported on election night something happened.
I hadn’t heard the Allen West story but that is shocking. We all know early voting was pushed on us as a way to extend the dems ability to commit fraud. Maybe they’ve just perfected it.
I wish I had noted some of the other early/absentee numbers from election night but they were all way off in favor of Obama in the swing states. I just don’t get it. The United State elections project web site has a list of all the OH absentee/early voters and total numbers adding up to 31% of the 2008 vote and they have it as last updated 11/5 before the election. If they had that why would the media not have the same info the next night and why did they start OH with a 60:40 split with a total that didn’t include more than 11% of OH’s voters, most of whom had to be Republican if you consider the 50:36:14 that even the democrats themselves reported for the party breakdown.
I need to find the total # that actually voted in person that night. Subtract that from the total votes counted and if it leaves 31% no obvious fraud but it leaves the 20% reported on election night something happened.