Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategerist
There were about 6%, or more than 200,000, MORE votes for Romney in Texas than there were for McCain. So where is the evidence that anyone stayed home?

I just posted it. Tell me when a RINO has won nationally in the last twenty years? That's 5 election cycles!

My Goodness you people are blind as bats! I would venture to bet Gingrich would have won.

41 posted on 11/08/2012 6:07:47 AM PST by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: sirchtruth

In Mississippi, even adjusting for the population increase from 2004 to 2012, Romney got 2% more votes than Bush did in 2004.

How is that remotely possible if Conservatives are staying home?


44 posted on 11/08/2012 6:13:21 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: sirchtruth
I just posted [evidence]. Tell me when a RINO has won nationally in the last twenty years? That's 5 election cycles!

You don't have evidence. What you have is a plausible theory as to why conservatives might not bother to vote.

You don't actually have evidence that conservatives didn't vote. I voted for Barr in 2008 (I was in Texas). This time, in Missouri, I didn't want to take any chances, so I voted for Romney. I didn't want to, but I did. From what I've seen on FR, lot's and lot's of committed conservatives did. The evidence is that conservatives had good turnout, but liberals had better turnout.

55 posted on 11/08/2012 7:06:23 AM PST by Mr. Know It All
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson