Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Already the liberal spinmeisters are blaming the tea party and conservatives for Romney's loss. The facts show the claim is not true.

The success Romney did achieve was due to their support. Romney's loss was due to a concoction of things involving the candidate himself, his team, his strategy, and his decisions.

Christopher Ruddy is CEO and editor of Newsmax Media

1 posted on 11/08/2012 4:53:34 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: KeyLargo

Indeed. And Romney was never a conservative but a liberal, establishment GOPer. If he had won the establishment media would say “see, you don’t need to be a Tea Partier to win as a Republican.”


2 posted on 11/08/2012 4:57:55 AM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I’m hearing that a large percentage of middle to older aged Republicans stayed home due to fear. They pictured violence and mass riots nationwide if Obama lost.


3 posted on 11/08/2012 5:01:09 AM PST by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

For you who had to read only Maya Angelou in literature classes, here’s Iago from Shakespeare’s Othello:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Edwin_Booth_as_Iago.jpg

I knew I shoulda take that PhotoShop class - anybody up to putting that fat Quisling Chris Christie in this costume?


4 posted on 11/08/2012 5:04:09 AM PST by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

>> The GOP will learn from this debacle.

Yeah, right - just like we learned from the McLame loss four years ago.


9 posted on 11/08/2012 5:12:40 AM PST by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

The Tea Party is/was suppose to be about fiscal responsibility, which is what Romney/Ryan ran on. It was not supposed to be about social issues. The fact that the democrats, the media, and even some here on FR successfully hung the Tea Party on the necks of those like Akin, Murdoch, et al tells me the movement is over. This is sad because the Tea Party movement as initially established had a message that could have appealed to the Ron Paul crowd as well as a good chunk of the 18-24 contingent, but we blew it and Obama won those votes despite being the antithesis of what they stand for. Instead of fiscal issues, they voted on pot, gays, and free contraception. Time to dissolve the “Tea Party” and rebrand while ditching the social issues. They need to be addressed at the state and local levels and not the federal level anyway.


10 posted on 11/08/2012 5:15:22 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

With the so-called ‘massive’ GOP voter turnout, and 0bummer getting 10 million votes less than in 2008, how could Romney have gotten 3 million less votes than McCain did? I guess the ‘massive’ wasn’t so ‘massive’, after all.

Mainly, the voter demographics have since massively changed, and not just in a ‘trended shift’. The GOP has some huge restructuring to do, to become relevant again, if ever.


14 posted on 11/08/2012 5:24:40 AM PST by Carriage Hill (America - a great idea while it lasted... it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Romney lost because he is Romney.

A product of a small insular group of poeple, who live in Utah.

We tried to rally the base, but fact is we were outnumbered because a lot of people simply do not trust his religion.

That is a fact, and very few are speaking of that. Romney’s religion joined with the fact that quite a lot of Republicans simply have sold out to foreign interests.

We need to bring back businesses to America.

And we need a leader.

We lost because we do not have one.


21 posted on 11/08/2012 5:47:46 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
I'm sick of this blame Romney crap. Romney lost because people want free stuff from the government. Obama offered more free stuff. If people stayed home, it was because they were afraid Romney was going to take away their free stuff, but couldn't vote for Obama. That's it. Period. It wasn't because we ran a moderate. In fact, it was because he was too conservative. Not that I want to win with a liberal, but people voted for free stuff. Game over. We lost. Conservatism lost. The majority of people don't want to do for themselves. They want to be handed everything. So, they voted for the party promising to give them other people's stuff. Tipping point reached and gone over. More people want free crap than want to do it for themselves. Until that changes (and it won't until we run out of other people's money, hat tip to Margaret Thatcher) we will not win a national election. Unless we promise more free stuff. In which case, it doesn't matter who wins.

This election has made me realize that I need to care less about politics and what goes on in DC and worry more about my personal relationships. Both with Christ and my family. The country is screwed, but I can't fix it. And the majority of people don't want it fixed, but want to continue to break it. So be it. Fine. Crash it. I'll be playing catch with my son.

24 posted on 11/08/2012 6:04:25 AM PST by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I think this article is pretty good. Of course, I had no idea mitt ran so few, so late, and so country club nicey ads against Obama. I did see his vicious anti newt ads so it is weird. Amazing that Rush Limbaugh even said that Romney would never run such ads against Obama. Wow.

.


31 posted on 11/08/2012 10:06:18 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

No. Trying to pin this loss on misguided endorsements by Chris Christie or Clint Eastwood’s gig with the empty chair is misdirected.

The American people knew FULL WELL that Obummer was a loser. Even behind the dense smokescreen thrown up by the mainstream media, the least among us knew full that Obummer was bad, wrong, misguided, dangerous and following a completely wrong course for America. The list of his errors and sins could fill a book. The anger on Election Day was palpable!

Nobody sung his praises. Nobody bragged about the wonderful things he did for the country. People were PISSED at Obummer.

But he won anyway. Why? Where did that anger go? American voters have always “done the right thing” before when faced with a terrible President, but this time they went the other way. Why? Something doesn’t add up here. Why?


34 posted on 11/08/2012 8:02:50 PM PST by DNME (It's never over. Never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson