Posted on 11/07/2012 5:53:47 PM PST by Bigtigermike
I live in NY, where I could have voted for Mickey Mouse and it wouldn’t have made one bit of difference, given the overwhelming liberalism here & the electoral college.
When I looked about my polling place, which was sheer bedlam — crowds of blacks, Hispanics, hipsters, truly the 7th circle of hell — my heart sank. People like us are in the minority now. Romney wasn’t “cool”; Obama appealed to all the neurotic females (I’m a woman, so don’t call me sexist) and the “99%”.
The election was truly a triumph of the emotional over the logical, an indicator of the change in tenor of American life. It did not leave me disappointed, but concerned over an ominous future.
Ultimately a blog ...
Ultimately a blog ...
I was enthusiastic about Romney. I was giddy about Rombey. So were my co-workers in a 75+ company where most are Republicans.
Where is this jerk from?
The electorate is not conservative. Not like people here are at the very least.
Establishment republicans truly only care about winning and they will always only care about winning because otherwise they won’t survive. Whatever survives ends up the establishment.
People here need to stop blaming other people and start taking responsibility for not convincing enough people of conservatisms correctness.
This is laziness. We are just whining and hoping others will do the work of convincing the population. That is basically how we will always lose.
If this is the opinion year after year no matter how small the percentage of people in this country who actually work (which has been shrinking for decades) every year conservatives pretend that all would have been great if we nominated a conservative.
Grow up. Take responsibility and start dedicating your life to convincing people until we can get a critical mass. Otherwise tell yourself whatever you need to tell yourself to feel good while conservatism fails for want of demand.
Paragraph 3 and 4 prove what I’ve been thinking all along. This election was stolen.
People kept telling me “they can’t stuff enough ballot boxes to overcome the people that are going to vote against him”.... yea but you sure could if you also get rid of enough of the other guys votes to make it possible.
Does anyone truly believe less people voted for Romney than McCain in 08?!?!? No way, no how, even with crappy turnout due to evangelicals and vote my concious conservatives. I knew too many people, middle of the road average joes, completely pissed and looking forward to voting out of office the man they voted for in 08.
A good percentage of the vote Obama DID NOT have in ‘12 that he had in ‘08 are the guys that were chomping at the bit to vote against him.
Any warm body could have won against Obama, if the election had not been f’d with.
You are correct.
It was voter fraud. Period. If the U.S. of Chicago had their way Mitt wouldn’t even have gotten Ann’s vote. The voting system is as corrupt as anything else we do.
Obama didn’t only win in states controlled by democrats.
Interesting analysis. It’s a crying shame that a +6 GOP electorate didn’t come out in force. If we had a ringing conservative, that would not have been the case. Even so, by staying home they’ve handed over our country to America’s sworn enemy. How can they sleep at night?
That is false. Moderates are also liberals and liberals are basically socialists.
Stop telling yourself this lie.
Every poll considers general adults more liberal/moderate than registered voters and registered voters more liberal/moderate than likely voters.
Romney has to take some of the blame for the lack of turnout for him. He decided early on he could win without support of true conservatives and/or Evangelicals. No Republican has won in my lifetime without the support of both. Evangelicals and/or true conservatives also cannot win without RINOs and some “moderates” so it cuts both ways. That is why starting a third party would be foolish beyond words, but no more foolish than the G.O.P. trying to throw conservatives and Evangelicals under the bus.
I don’t care what the perceived flaws with Romney were, even if every single flaw he has been accused of was 100% valid it is still NO EXCUSE for letting Obama win. Anybody who did either of those is guilty of either an intellectual or a moral failure.
Not trying to be argumentative, but actually I do believe that. As an example, until about two months ago anyone on this forum who expressed support for Romney was pounced on almost immediately. There were some heated discussions on the matter with many declaration of intent to not vote or to vote 3rd party. While that moderated as time went on, there were still many who could never accept him.
While this forum is not truly representative of the republican voters at large, it does give an indication of the strong negative feelings existent. Questions about religion, abortion, and health care seemed to be issues that went beyond normal political disagreement and became matters of principle. Many voters who felt this way simply did not vote.
Well said...
I agree with you. And even though it didn’t seem like much at the time, every time Romney agreed with Obama on anything during the debates, I could see his numbers falling like a backwards odometer. Not a good plan. You can’t say you are a contrast or opposite of your opponent if you keep agreeing with him. Romney is a nice man. In fact, he was much too nice for this deadly race.
Was there a disparity in Republican turnout in a sure thing state as opposed to a contested state? Was the turnout in Wisconsin, for example, close to what it was in the recall elections but the Democrats simply outperformed on the ground there? In other words, was the Republican and a Democrat turnout alike depressed where it is rational not to bother to vote because the outcome was known in advance, but was turnout along Republican lines equal to or only mildly depressed from expectations in contested states where the Democrats won because they outperformed on the ground?
Just askin'
I was watching the individual counties on election day using Politico and seeing an improvement for Romney over McCain across the board in in counties in Virginia, Florida and North Carolina and the final vote counts there show that as well. Romney did improve turnout slightly in Virginia, Florida, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Colorado if those are the final numbers.
I see that he lost 100,000 votes in Ohio though and that’s a bit fishy.
I don’t know where else the difference in his final vote tally is. Perhaps its the Hurricane or people are just better at knowing in what states their votes don’t matter much. Though in some states perhaps it was a little fruad involved such as Pennsylvania.
One other thing to consider, though I doubt that is a large reason is that a lot of our vote is in the elderly and we obviously would have lost some elderly voters to natural causes in the last 4 years.
If it really is turnout somehow than great. But I don’t think that is the whole story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.