Interesting that when you wrote or called her office to give her useful information about pending legislation, or to ask a question, her flunquies always demanded you prove you resided in her little San Francisco city district. That, even though she was Speaker of the USA Congress and controlling bills that impacted every American (such as Obamacare). They said they were under strict instructions to accept no inputs from anybody not voting and contributing to her from her little 10 or 20 block district of the City of San Francisco.
BUT it seems she actually lives 60 miles away from the noisy,teeming, and frankly dirty streets of San Francisco.
She lives in the bucolic Wine Country, instead, surrounded by miles of rich country manors and, of course, nice pretty grape vines everywhere.
She is also said to use strong-arm tactics to prevent her winery workers, many of whom are allegedly illegal aliens, from unionizing. This has been stated many times by many people over the years (I do not have any personal knowledge of this allegation, other than its widespread and long-lasting nature).
Seems that, at the very least, Nancy’s status as a representative of San Francisco needs to be looked into?
Or can people claim to live in one place and to represent that place, while actually living many miles away? This is something that seems wrong...? Is this permitted, and if so why? I would not want my representative to live 60 miles and 3 counties away....
Sheesh you think that is Pelosi’s only home? That is her 2nd home in Napa Valley. Of course she owns a San Francisco mansion!
http://www.celebrityhousepictures.com/nancy-pelosi.php