why do you think democracy was done a disservice because *more* eligible voters turned out? you think democracy would have been better served if only white males were allowed to vote? were you aware that your political ideology lost world war 2 more than half a century ago? face it, the anglo-saxon, or aryan if you’d prefer, male dominant world is gone and isn’t coming back. oh and for those of you considering moving to canada after the election results; fuck off, we don’t want you. obama’s too conservative to get elected in canada. i don’t know if you’ve been paying attention at all but we’re actually a socialist country. trudeau, one of our greatest prime ministers, wrote glasnost and perestroika with the soviet ambassador to canada in the 80s. true story.
I believe the point is not about excluding voters. The point is that western democracy will work when voters vote for political ideas and proven leadership and experience rather than skin color.
It will begin to break down when they do not. What is under discussion is that in the last election there was an element of pride that all races voted for a minority candidate. It was understandable that an inexperienced candidate would gain a lot of enthusiasm for breaking a barrier.
In this election the candidate no longer had no history, but rather a history of failure and lack of regard for traditional separation of power under the Constitution. This apparently had no effect on the racial demographic from which he came.
If our leadership roles begin to be, like the third world, just a way for various tribes to gain powers over the others, this is a big step down from ‘who will best lead our unified country’.
Of course you knew this because you knew that because you are a racist liberal idiot.
I believe the point is not about excluding voters. The point is that western democracy will work when voters vote for political ideas and proven leadership and experience rather than skin color.
It will begin to break down when they do not. What is under discussion is that in the last election there was an element of pride that all races voted for a minority candidate. It was understandable that an inexperienced candidate would gain a lot of enthusiasm for breaking a barrier.
In this election the candidate no longer had no history, but rather a history of failure and lack of regard for traditional separation of power under the Constitution. This apparently had no effect on the racial demographic from which he came.
If our leadership roles begin to be, like the third world, just a way for various tribes to gain powers over the others, this is a big step down from ‘who will best lead our unified country’.
Of course you knew this because that because you are a racist liberal idiot.